With the Apple Watch, it looks like 3’s the charm
[caption id="attachment_35927" align="aligncenter" width="1140"]
Illustration: Kevin Whipple[/caption]
As you’d expect, the first wave of stories about Apple’s big announcements last week centered on the debut of the 10th anniversary edition of the iPhone (the eponymous “X”) and its duller siblings, the 8 and 8 Plus. (See canonical Flipboard magazine here.)
But in the following days, the narrative in Techland shifted to an intense, and possibly contrarian, gadget lust for the Apple Watch Series 3.
The new series 3 makes me want to ditch my phone for the first time.—Jesus Diaz, writing in Fast CompanyI hadn’t realized I wanted to ditch my iPhone before I saw the new Watch; now I pretty much agree with everything Jesus Diaz says in his Fast Company piece. I’m sick of lugging around my 6 Plus and would like to downsize. Since I’m in front of my laptop so much anyway, I mainly need something for meetings and trips between home and office—a watch could be perfect for that. To ignore Apple’s siren song and not buy a new iPhone…say, there’s a provocative idea. It almost feels like I’d be resisting The Man: rather than giving Cupertino $1,000, I’ll only pay $400! (Plus $10 a month forever to AT&T for the watch’s data connection.) Eat it, Apple! [caption id="attachment_35887" align="alignnone" width="1024"]
Apple CEO Tim Cook unveils the Apple Watch Series 3. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)[/caption]
Of course, it’s that kind of thinking that will, I guess, help Apple establish a new blockbuster business. In fact, lost in all the fanfare of the past week (heartfelt Daring Fireball paean to the new Apple HQ and Steve Jobs here) is that the Watch could be Apple’s first true hit of the post-Jobs era.
The dreamer might even dare to say that the Apple Watch could yet become the iPhone successor that the company has long sought. At the very least, it could become a key part of the system that succeeds the iPhone—a wrist-mounted control center for your personal cloud.—Will Oremus, writing in SlateTo be fair, I’d been on the Watch fence for a while. Its first two iterations were increasingly interesting. But there was a literal and figurative disconnect: until now, its best use case was for fitness buffs, and the lack of a data connection meant limited music and other options, unless you also ferried along your phone. And if you did that, what was the point? May as well stay home, drink beer and eat potato chips, which was the path I and a great many others took. But this Watch—if it works as advertised—puts a lot of Apple disparate projects together at last and creates the kind of synergy that Steve Case and Jerry Levin couldn’t even imagine:
- Siri: Finally, there’s a compelling and persistent use for Siri. I’ve always been a half-hearted Siri user—it’s one of those features that I forget to use. But now that you can give commands to your Watch—and it can talk back—I could be a believer. (“Could” is the operative word here, though, since so far Siri has been a fairly weak product.)
- Airpods: Headphones have always been a particular obsession of mine (or a “soul-sapping sickness,” as my wife calls it). I showed Zen-like restraint when the Airpods arrived, in part because they were so silly looking. But enough dweebs have given me cover that last week I sneaked out and bought a pair. They are, as some in the tech press say, life changing. (Though they are also so special looking that people give me double takes on the street.)
- Apple Music: I’ve been a Napster subscriber for so long, I remember when it was called Rhapsody. But if I can integrate Apple Music into my Watch-‘pod-Siri combo and summon any music I want like some kind of ubiquitous music genie? I’ll switch.
The new Apple Watch Series 3. (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)[/caption]